Special offer

Why Hiring a Professional is so Important

By
Home Inspector with JRV Home Inspection Services, LLC HOI 394

Many homeowners today believe lead is no longer a concern. But recently the lead found in children's toys has rekindled awareness of this all too common toxin. Lead paint is estimated to be found in three quarters of the housing stock in the United States. Families wanting to protect their children and themselves have been buying and using home lead test kits. The problem is these kits are extremely unreliable. The best and most reliable method to test for lead is hiring a professional service outfitted with the proper testing equipment.

Below is the news release from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission regarding these home lead test kits.

U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

Office of Information and Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20207


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 22, 2007
Release #08-038

CPSC Hotline: (800) 638-2772
CPSC Media Contact: (301) 504-7908

 

CPSC Staff Study: Home Lead Test Kits Unreliable

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) today announced the results of a special evaluation of consumer lead test kits. CPSC staff used commonly available test kits on a variety of paints and other products containing different levels of lead. Many of the tests performed using the kits did not detect lead when it was there (false negatives); some indicated lead was present when it was not (false positives). Of 104 total test results, more than half (56) were false negatives, and two were false positives. None of the kits consistently detected lead in products if the lead was covered with a non-leaded coating. Based on the study consumers should not use lead test kits to evaluate consumer products for potential lead hazards. These findings are consistent with previous CPSC staff test results.

CPSC staff studied two common types of home lead test kits that are based on chemical reactions involving rhodizonate ion or sulfide ion. Most test kits were developed to detect levels of lead in household paint that are usually much higher than CPSC's regulatory maximum level of 0.06%. As a result, staff found that these kits may not be useful for detecting relatively low lead paint concentrations or for detecting lead in other materials, such as metal jewelry or vinyl products. Also, both types of kits may be affected by substances such as iron, tin, or dirt, or by paint colors that can cause the color in the test kit to change or hide the color change, thereby interfering with interpretation of the test results.

As part of the study of lead test kits, CPSC staff also evaluated the use of x-ray fluorescence (XRF) for screening for lead in paint and other products. Twelve of 13 samples were correctly identified as containing lead. The staff notes that this technology may be of use by a professional inspector for screening for the presence or absence of lead in products, particularly for surface level lead. However, XRF detectors are generally not available for consumer use. Further, use of an XRF device requires knowledge, training and consideration of its limitations. For example, XRF detectors have limited depth of penetration so, for certain applications such as children's metal jewelry, it is possible for the surface coating to mask the presence of potentially hazardous leaded base metal underneath.

Consumers should exercise caution when using these test kits to evaluate consumer products for potential lead exposures. False results can make it difficult or impossible for consumers to determine the proper course of action to take. In fact, CPSC staff has tested a number of other samples that had been identified by consumers and others based on their use of inexpensive test kits as having high lead levels. To date, none of these items has actually had high lead levels based on CPSC lab analysis. This is another indication of the poor reliability of the kits for this purpose. Testing by a qualified laboratory and trained personnel is the only way to accurately assess the potential risk posed by a consumer product that may contain lead.

Consumers can stay informed of lead-related recalls by signing up for email announcements at http://www.cpsc.gov/cpsclist.aspx. Consumers who suspect that their child has been exposed to excessive levels of lead, should immediately contact a physician.

James Quarello
JRV Home Inspection Services, LLC

Posted by

James Quarello
Connecticut Home Inspector
Former SNEC-ASHI President
JRV Home Inspection Services, LLC

 ASHI Certified Inspector

To find out more about our other high tech services we offer in Connecticut click on the links below:

Learn more about our Infrared Thermal Imaging & Diagnostics services.

Serving the Connecticut Counties of Fairfield, Hartford, Middlesex, New Haven, Southern Litchfield and Western New London.

Joseph Lang
Pillar To Post Professional Home Inspection - Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Home Inspector, Southern California
James, good info.  And you're right, if the test isn't valid or the person doing the test is untrained, it means nothing!  Good post.
Nov 13, 2007 07:32 AM
Dale Baker
Baker Energy Audits and Commercial Properties Inspections - Claremont, NH
New Hampshire Relocation Real Estate Information

Howdy James

Very good post and info. In NH to teat you have to be a Certified Lead Contractor with the state.

Have a good one

Dale

Nov 14, 2007 09:19 AM
Bill Duncan
Home Status Inspection Company, LLC - Haymarket, VA

Thanks James for posting this.  I subscribe to the CPSC's alert line, but somehow missed this one. 

I thoroughly agree that people should have their houses tested.   Don't forget that alot of people had left over paints in their garages and basements so houses built in the 80's some times will have lead paint showing up.  

I used to agree with the conventional wisdom that by now the lead paint in a house will be covered over, but not any more.  I have seen lead reports on houses that show lead paint on nearly every surface! 

In Virginia testing for lead requires a certification as well and the tests are not cheap.  $350 to $400 gets a report on standard sized house.  

Nov 14, 2007 11:06 PM
Rod Finch
Pioneer Property Inspectors LLC - La Crosse, WI
Hey James great info thanks for sharing.
Nov 16, 2007 07:12 AM