Special offer

Private transfer fees experience the ire of FHFA

By
Services for Real Estate Pros

Silverstone Ranch, Las Vegas, NVIt looks like the Federal Housing Finance Agency - or FHFA - is getting ready to introduce new regulations later this year that would prevent Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks - FHLBanks - from investing in mortgage loans tagged with these now notorious private transfer fees. This would then effectively bring major government-controlled home loan players in agreement about them, because FHA already is, according to HUD's regulations, banned from insuring mortgages on homes with private transfer fees. They are considered "legal restrictions on conveyance" in FHA talk.

These private transfer fees are brought to life by covenants attached to a deed that result in a payment to a third party every time a home is sold. The fee generally is 1% of the sales price and paid by the buyer, who may or may not know about it until he's sitting all excited at the closing table. Finding out about it typically elevates his blood pressure even further. Home builders are the ones who usually - but not always - would do this type of thing, giving them an additional, effortless revenue source for 99 years, the standard duration of the arrangement.

FHFA finds several problems with them. They hike home ownership costs up front, make property transfers more complicated and sometimes legally uncertain because regular title searches may not reveal their existence, particularly after multiple ownership changes. They can cause trouble elsewhere, too. Secondary mortgage market investors, lenders and title firms are vulnerable to possible hidden liens and title flaws.

The increased cost factor to home buyers and legal issues for mortgage industry participants are by themselves enough to cause concern. The other big issue is that the home builder who sets up the private fee structure does not provide any service or product to enable him to honestly earn the continuous stream of income. When it's finished with a subdivision, it's gone but would still collect for a long time money for free. Frankly, this seems to take us back to the creative instruments Wall Street not so long ago came up with that ultimately led to the current mortgage and real estate meltdown.

FHFA is on the right track to decisively curtail this from spreading any further. At the moment government entities control over 90% of the mortgage market, so its upcoming regulation will effectively put a stop to private transfer fees, for the good of consumers and the home loan and housing industries.

 

 

Posted by

_______________________________________________________________________________

Provided by: 

Esko Kiuru
Mortgage, real estate and apartment industry analyst 

www.BluefoxToday.com - syndicated mortgage, housing and property management blog

eskokiuru@gmail.com
My cell: 702-499-1006

George Souto
George Souto NMLS #65149 FHA, CHFA, VA Mortgages - Middletown, CT
Your Connecticut Mortgage Expert

Esko, I have not encounter that around here, but I agree with the regulation if this is going on.

Aug 24, 2010 03:07 PM
Anonymous
bob

You sound happy that the government controls your industry.

Did the FHFA find problems or did the NAR and ALTA spend millions of dollars to "help" them find baseless, unproven problems?

 

Aug 30, 2010 10:00 AM
#2
Renée Donohue~Home Photography
Savvy Home Pix - Allegan, MI
Western Michigan Real Estate Photographer

I always appreciate your great insight to issues related to housing Esko!  Thanks again!

Sep 01, 2010 11:17 AM
Kate Kate
San Diego, CA

Thanks Esko. An unexpected 1 percent fee at closing can do more than raise blood pressure. Potentially, it could derail a transaction for a seller and buyer and put our economy one step behind.

Bob, if I may speak for Esko, I believe he was stating the facts about who is controlling the mortgage market currently and thus this measure could benefit the public. Not expressing an opinion over the merits of government control.

Sep 03, 2010 04:51 AM
Anonymous
Bob

If one of these types of covenants does exist in the county records, I believe the TITLE agent is responsible for identifying and giving proper notification to the buyer.

This should NEVER be a surprise at the closing table if the TITLE agent does their job. The buyer would be fully aware and would negotiate the contract accordingly.

If not, the title agent is negligent.

 

Sep 03, 2010 09:21 AM
#5
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

George,

This transfer fee isn't widely used and this FHFA action will pretty much spell its total demise.

Sep 04, 2010 01:06 PM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Bob,

The real estate industry is better off without junk fees like this.

Sep 04, 2010 01:08 PM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Renee,

Appreciate your continuous encouragement.

Sep 04, 2010 01:08 PM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Kate,

I agree. This is another attempt to make money without any benefit to anyone, except the developer.

Sep 04, 2010 01:11 PM
Anonymous
Greg

<!--StartFragment-->The reality is that Capital Recovery Fees represent a fair and equitable way to spread infrastructure costs over those who benefit.  Capital Recovery Fees typically take the form of a 1% fee, paid by the seller each time title to the property transfers, usually for 99 years. The fees are imposed by large-scale developers as a way to spread the significant costs associated with the installation of roads, utilities and other infrastructure over those who benefit.  These development projects create jobs and add to the tax base. <!--EndFragment-->

Sep 16, 2010 07:50 AM
#10
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Greg,

I don't know about your argument.

Sep 16, 2010 02:19 PM