Special offer

Something I just don't understand

By
Real Estate Agent with Century 21 Redwood DC-SP98366576

(note: This was originally posted before I had any idea that you had to direct where it would appear.)

The spring and summer market seems to be caught up in the ice cold winter market. There does not appear to be a thaw on the horizon. Everyday more people decide to list their home. You can drive down some streets and see three, four or five for sale signs. At the rate we are going, open houses will be replaced with block party's.

Speaking of open houses, I had the opportunity to host one this past weekend. I like to have copies of the listings for comparable properties available for any guest with a small map that shows where the other properties are located. This weekend's map looked more like a walking tour of the neighborhood than a poor man's version of mapquest.

I did notice one thing about the visitors that seems to be more prevalent than in years past. The guests that replied to the question "Are you represented by a Realtor?" in the affirmative, had no Realtor in tow. They were either just out looking on their own or their Realtor gave them a list of "open houses" and told them to report back if there was anything that interested them. This is a rather disturbing trend in our industry.

I first noticed buyers coming by "open houses" without their Realtor a few years back. They were usually represented by an agent that offered a cut rate service. The deal was something like - you go out and find a home that you like and I will then write an offer for you. These poor folks would faithfully take newspaper ads, a full tank of gas and go off spending their Sunday's visiting as many "open houses" as they could fit into the one o'clock to four o'clock schedule. If they came across the home of their dreams, they would call the agent and start the ball rolling.

Those agents set a precedent that is horrific to those of us that understand the importance of true representation. Their cost saving business plan has begun a trend that does nothing for the poor consumer and lines the agents pockets with commissions paid but not honestly earned. Homebuyers are supposed to be excited when they find their dream home. The prospect of possibly paying less for full service and getting the home they want seems like a great deal.

All that appears on the surface is not the total picture. When a buyer enters an contractual agreement with a buyer's agent, the agent's responsibilities are much more than just writing an offer. Agents are trained in every aspect of the transaction. An agent sees more in a house than any buyer will see in a potential home. A Realtor begins using their knowledge when they first review a listing in the multiple listing service. Who is the agent representing the seller and what is the reputation of that broker regarding how smoothly the transaction will unfold? Does that broker have a reputation that indicates the transaction may not close on time if at all? How long has the house been on the market and why has it been on the market that long? What are similar homes in that area selling for? After compiling a reasonable list of homes that meet their current buyer's needs, a Realtor goes over this information and PLANS TO VISIT the homes with their clients. Realtors know that the listing agents will give directions that take you through the best and enticing route. The agent representing a buyer should make sure that their client is aware of everything in the area surrounding the home.

Buyers love the feel of homes. Their Realtor is supposed to review the disclosures and condition of the home. Many first time homebuyers don't know the difference between a furnace and a hot water heater. If they know that, they usually don't know the tell tale signs of trouble on the horizon. Most buyers can not decipher the condition of a roof. A Realtor can judge the wear and tear with a glance. The list of potential pitfalls is quite long. It is much bettor to have these potential problems pointed out in the beginning. It is a disgrace that the "stay in the office and let them look agents" fall back on the "we can do a home inspection" route. Information gathered at a home inspection comes well after the buyers have fallen in love with the home. A hot water heater with little life left may not seem as important after a home has already been emotionally purchased. If that information had been shared at the initial viewing - it may have knocked the house out of the dream home category.

I suppose the major problem I have with buyers left to their own devices is that it represents a total disregard of what our profession used to stand for. People became Realtors because they enjoyed helping people buy and sell homes. Sending clients out on their own is a total abdication of responsible behavior. The agent is still liable for problems that arise out of their action or lack of action. Those that cut costs and fail to fully do their job may be rolling the proverbial dice and hoping nothing bad will happen, but I dare say they have failed miserably when it comes to doing the job they should be doing.

I am not soliciting anyone, I am just sharing a fact. If your agent is sending you out on your own, you may save a dollar now, but you are not getting the representation you deserve and are paying for.

Comments(8)

Ken Bell
Realty Executives Brio - Bellevue, WA
Very well written John. I really enjoyed reading your post. It is up to the Realtor association as a whole to make sure that our clients understand this. Well said...........
Jun 28, 2006 08:36 AM
Simon Conway
Orlando Area Real Estate Services - Orlando, FL
John - the sentiment and style of your posting is of the highest order as always.
Jul 01, 2006 07:33 AM
John MacArthur
Century 21 Redwood - Washington, DC
Licensed Maryland/DC Realtor, Metro DC Homes

Brio - Thanks. If the association doesn't make this clear, each of us has to realize at some point...this is our profession.

Simon - I appreciate your words. Thanks.

Sep 07, 2007 02:19 AM
James Downing - Metro DC Houses Team REALTORS®, CRS, GRI, ABR,MRP, MilRes
Real Living | At Home - Washington, DC
When Looking to Buy or Sell - Make the Right Move

John-

Good post - but there is more to be said!  If the buyers are working with a "Discount Agent" - the sad thing is this - WHY?!  The buyers generally are not paying the commission anyway - the sellers are.  So why would a buyer working with anyone who was not full service?

Then we get into the legislation in Virginia where a Limited Service Broker MUST disclose in writing what they WILL and WILL NOT do.  There is a whole other can of worms there.

And we have not even addressed procuring cause....

Point being - as you said John - If you have a Buyer's Agent - They need to be working for you - NOT sending you out on your own!

 

Sep 07, 2007 08:32 AM
John MacArthur
Century 21 Redwood - Washington, DC
Licensed Maryland/DC Realtor, Metro DC Homes

James - I appreciate your thoughts. I am with you on every point except the implication that the sellers are paying the commission. Literally speaking, the broker representing the sale is co-oping their commission. It is also a fact that the price of the home was computed to include the cost of sales. The broker may be distributing the funds, but the buyers are funding the transaction.

I think that gives them every right to demand full representation.

Sep 07, 2007 10:16 AM
Jennifer Allan-Hagedorn
Sell with Soul - Pensacola Beach, FL
Author of Sell with Soul
This comes back to the concept of getting what you pay for and knowing what you're paying for. If the buyer wants to "earn" a portion of the commission, more power to him.  The flaw in this practice is that other people (listing agents in particular, but often unsuspecting "buyer" agents) are the ones typically doing the legwork for the guy doing the rebate. I would think that Procuring Cause would be a BIG issue for the rebaters... I'd love to hear more.
Sep 07, 2007 11:30 PM
John MacArthur
Century 21 Redwood - Washington, DC
Licensed Maryland/DC Realtor, Metro DC Homes

Jennifer - I completely understand the concept of "if the buyer wants to "earn" a portion of the commisson, more power to him." There are more flaws with the concept than what you have mentioned. The first problem is the language. The commission is going to be paid to the buyers agent through the agreement in the MLS. The buyers agent can not share, the buyers agent can only rebate. If they choose to do so, I believe that the buyers should be required to sign a "release of liability for all parties involved in the transaction for anything that may go wrong relating to the physical condition of the home, terms of the sale and any actions of the listing agent." Once buyers understand they are accepting full responsibility for their actions, they may reconsider.

The other point that has always had me leaning on the "always have an agent" side of the argument harkens back to my youth and attempting to change the oil in my car and graduating to replacing the brakes and finally moving on to a complete rebuilding of my motorcycle engine. The oil change was like viewing homes, rather easy to do on my own. It also gave me a false sense of security. That sense of security led me to the brake job. I got through it. The car did stop. The brake job was sort of like poking around a house and trying to identify that musty smell or what do the creaky floors mean and will the turqouise tile in the bathroom be that hard to replace? I later learned that the shoes were installed in reverse order and subsequently wore out very quickly. The engine rebuild, following an oil change and brake job was a piece of cake. That is what I thought. It is like looking at the furnace, the hot water heater and the air conditioning unit. Taking it apart was very easy. Re-assembly seemed easy, I just was concerned the there were still nuts and bolts on the workbench when I was convinced the job was done. I learned that there is a tremendous value to experience and using a professional is prudent.

I suppose I can also say that I would not assist the pilot fly the plane for a reduced plane ticket. I would not assist in surgery on myself for a reduced rate. I would not go back in the kitchen at McDonalds and assist with cooking to get a half priced meal. There is a natural order to things in my world and one of those orders is to allow the experts to do their job.

The procuring cause issue continues to raise the hackles of many. Procuring cause will not be recognized until we as agents for those that write the laws to write one that will be specific and not open to the interpretation of any jurist. We as agents have no doubt about who should benefit from the concept, the legal system does not always see it our way. I would support very clear guidelines that can not be danced around by agents coming in after the fact.

Erica - The first thing that stops those folks is the question -"what is your agent's name?" followed by "what company does he/she work for?" If they survive that, I trade answer for answer. I begin with getting their name and contact information so that I can let their 'agent" know the same information that I share with them. I only give out basic price,bed, bath and nothing beyond on the phone. If they want to see the property, I only ask that they have their agent set up an appointment. If they balk and say the agent is busy, I offer to fax them a financial information sheet to fill out and return along with a letter from their lender stating that they are pre-qualified for a loan that would pay for my listing. I let them know that once I have verified their assets and their ability to purchase the home, I will be glad to show them the home. I advise them that this will put their agent in the category of a sub agent and any offer would be under the sub-agent guidelines in MLS.

Sep 08, 2007 12:23 AM