We've all seen those REO and Short Sale listings with the disclaimer, "Seller to choose escrow/title company." Is this legal? Maybe not. Lenders selling properties, AND SELLER'S AGENTS REPRESENTING THOSE LENDERS, better be cautious not to violate RESPA! Lender/sellers CAN select the escrow company, but the buyer is FREE to use ANY title company he selects.
From the CA real estate legal update, here is the memo I just received:
"PRACTICE UPDATE: REO LENDER CANNOT REQUIRE BUYER TO PURCHASE TITLE INSURANCE FROM ANY PARTICULAR COMPANY
"No seller can require that the buyer purchase title insurance from any particular title insurance company. This rule pertains to transactions involving a federally-related mortgage loan for one-to-four residential units as defined under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) (12 U.S.C. section 2608). Although this is a well-established rule under RESPA, it bears repeating given the recent upsurge in REO transactions.
"REO transactions are not exempt from RESPA requirements. If an REO lender chooses the title insurance company, as is often the case, it cannot require directly or indirectly, as a condition to selling the property, that the buyer purchase the title insurance policy. An REO lender that violates this RESPA requirement can be, among other things, held liable to the buyer in the amount equal to three times all charges made for such title insurance. Moreover, anyone who believes that RESPA has been violated may file a complaint (and may request confidentiality) to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). For more information about filing a RESPA complaint, go to http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/res/respamor.cfm#HE2."
Join my NEW group for professionals who work from their home office at http://activerain.com/groups/virtualoffice
Regina P. Brown
Broker, Realtor®, e-Pro
Author of eBook "Stop Foreclosure Fast: Solutions to Save your House"
Text copyright © 2009 R.P. Brown, All Rights Reserved
Comments(9)