But I Represent My Client Not Yours
I'm one of those agents that believes that our work is not without empathy for the party on the other side of the transaction. Trust me, I feel for your client and their hardship and the sad stories that come along with their situation. But empathetic or not, I can't put the best interest of your client over the best interest of my own client.
Yes I know s/he has had a really hard time with the mortgage payments, loss of job, divorce and some loss of loved ones. And trust me when I say, my heart goes out to the seller, but in the end, I can't put the best interest of your seller before the best interest of my buyer.
Yes, I know that the buyer is struggling with the required 3% down payment and could use the full 6% seller contribution to closing cost, but my seller is a bit stretched for cash too, hence they are already having to bring some money to the table. Believe me when I say, I work with buyers too and I truly understand the need for seller contribution to the buyer closing cost. But here's the deal, I represent the seller and I can't put the best interest of your buyer ahead of the best interest of my seller nor can I encourage the seller to do it either.
Look here's the deal, I don't have ice water running through my veins and I would hate to think that my existence is without empathy. But in the grand scheme of things, I can't represent my client and yours too. If you feel the need to lay your client's sob story on me, I'll listen with a compassionate ear, in my heart, I'll feel bad for them, but in the end, my client's best interest takes priority over your clients unfortunate plight. I know it sounds cold, but in reality, if I put the needs of your client before the needs of my clients, then I shouldn't be allowed to practice real estate because clearly I wouldn't know where to draw the line.
So bottom line is this, "but I represent my clients NOT yours." You understand don't you?
Comments(90)