Special offer

Fannie Mae And "Homepath Financing" is bad for our long term market correction

By
Services for Real Estate Pros with Pacific Servicing

The federal government is doing their best to stop the housing market decline, but are they really going about it in a manner that is not hurting our economy in the long run?

60% of our local REO listings are Fannie Mae owned assets. These homes are priced 10-30% above current market value. Current market value is supported by active & recent sold comps in the subject’s neighborhood. Fannie Mae constantly prices their assets at absurd prices, and when you challenge their price, you will be shocked at their response.

I recently made an offer on a Fannie Mae owned property in my area, which was listed at $243,000. The actual value of the home was $180,000, as it had an unfinished remodel, and was an older tract home in central Temecula. I even had an appraiser pull comps to support my conventional offer of $180,000. My offer was rejected without so much as a counter offer. When I spoke to the listing office, their response was as follows: “If you really want the home, pay $243,000 for it, utilize homepath financing, and they will lend without ordering an appraisal on it” My jaw dropped upon hearing that response. They acknowledge they are selling assets at puffed up inflated values, but their answer is to utilize their lender, and to overlook the fact that you are paying $63,000 above the current market value.

How is this protecting the home buyers? The people that work hard daily to provide for their families? To advise them to pay over market value for a home in an unstable market. What happens when that family relocates jobs in 2 years and goes to sell the home, only to realize it is worth $190,000 (2.5% yearly appreciation). They will then be faced with 2 tough options… rent it out for a loss, or lose the home to foreclosure.

So to sum it up, rather than just let the market correct itself, the government chooses to pay off all major banks to hold back foreclosures, and let the shadow inventory rise to an all time high, while at the same time releasing homes priced an average of 20% above actual market value, again, with their reasoning being if you utilize their “homepath financing”, they will not worry about an appraisal. So let’s not educate buyers, instead letting them make bad financial decisions, which can hurt them down the road if they need to sell, or if their needs change.

Did I also mention homepath financing rates on average are 1% higher than traditional banks? They also don’t care about condos with insolvent HOA’s! Another huge problem when a homebuyer goes to resell... Because most lenders do not lend on complexes with HOA’s in trouble, simply because the default rate on loans in that complex is typically higher than normal.

So is this really the solution? To force the market up by advising homebuyer’s to pay 20% over market value simply to get into a home? To sweeten the pot for agents showing government owned properties by offering 4% commission out? To offer buyers 3.5% in closing costs to basically make it a cost free loan? Sounds to me like the government is trying to force home prices up, which in turn is causing homebuyers to make bad choices and could inevitably set our market back another 3-5 years.

Thoughts? Comments? Please Share!

Posted by

 

 

Ryan Case - Partner

Pacific Servicing, LLC

Ryan@PacificServicing.com

(800) 313-9050 - Office

(951) 760-3170 - Mobile

(951) 501-2926 - Fax

ps

Donne Knudsen
Los Angeles & Ventura Counties in CA - Simi Valley, CA
CalState Realty Services

Ryan - I have not been a big fan of fannies HomePath or freddies HomeSteps programs.  While I will explain them if someone asks me about them, I do not actively promote them because I am seeing just way too much crap going on with those particular listings and they are just bad products on so many levels.

Mar 09, 2010 05:47 AM
Ryan Case
Pacific Servicing - Temecula, CA

I agree. It's a total joke. They expect buyers to overpay 10-30% just because the seller will finance and overlook all issues with the complex, the value, the property, its a total sham and a shame that our government is able to do business this way. They are not fixing or correcting the market, just enabling buyers to make bad descisions by enticing the agents to show (4%) and the buyers to buy (3.5% bcc, overlook issues, overlook inflated price).. Its lending in bad faith!

Mar 09, 2010 05:53 AM
Anonymous
MattR

I am just looking into buying a house first time buyer  20yrs old and just got a look at an unfinished home with the homepath program I loved the home its almost livable as is needs kitchen work to be livable but loved the house is this something i should continue looking into or steer clear of a big mess? please feel free to answer just want to be off on a good start not a life long disaster 

Jun 13, 2010 07:38 PM
#3
Anonymous
Elise Fay

Ryan I could not have said it better myself!  I am encountering the same thing here in Arizona.  My most recent transaction was one where the buyer waited 4 mos on a short sale only to have Fannie Mae take it back in foreclosure (rightly so as the 2nd would not even respond to them).  My client had a lot of time invested in this home and when it came back as bank owned the price was easily $10-15K higher than the area comps.

When I confronted the listing agent he told me Fannie feels that with the Arizona market showing a big demand for bank owned homes, instead of dealing with bidding wars, they are pricing the homes higher than comps.  Now my client was going conventional financing and we were told that if because of the appraisal contingency in our contract, that if 2 identical offers came in, Fannie would choose the HomePath financing because that would eliminate the appraisal issues.  That just disgusts me!  My client knew all the facts and decided to move ahead with the transaction.  I have another one where the price was only about $5k over area comps (price range $55-60K for the property.

Where homeowners have lost out on multiple offer situations or are getting out bid by cash buyers (we have plenty) they are willing to pay the higher price, if they can.

This is just so typical of the games the government plays.  Fannie and Freddie are so strapped for cash that they are more concerned with the immediate rewards as opposed to looking at the long term ramifications but...by that time they may be out of business.

Thank you for your timely article.

Elise Fay

Sep 22, 2011 08:23 AM
#4