|
Find TX real estate agents and Austin real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
49 Comments on The Lender is STUPID for Not Accepting My Offer! Aren't They?
I recently had one where the investor changed their mind. All caused because some administrator inadvertently closed our file by mistake and by the time it was re-opened Freddic Mac wanted more money. Crazy but we are set to close next week--fingers crossed. The seller had to cough up the cash for this one. The loss mitigator is still pulling his hair out!
Roger -- I look forward to reading it!
Manuel -- Amen!
Corinne -- UGH! I hope you close, but we've had similar situations. Closed, but frustrating!
Fantastic post pointing out both sides of the story. It is frustrating on the front lines from both agents and buyers.
I am certain short sale approval decisions are governed by some advanced form of logic none of us are capable of understanding or attaining.
Good post. Isn't it funny how guidelines, designed supposedly to make jobs easier and faster, have managed to slow down the process and make it more complicated. If they would just trust their employees and investors to use their own brains, we'd all be better off (well, maybe?).
I love this post.
Excellent way to describe how stupid they appear to be. In my opinion...lenders should be employing Realtors to negotiate instead of unqualified people. and they should be local. How can someone know the true value of a FL property if they are negotiating from Osh Kosh and have never even touched or felt the structure? And I definately agree that in most cases...trying to explain this to a seller or a buyer is very difficult let a lone getting them to understand why.
It sounds more like the servicer should be negotiating but not all short sales are killed because they didn't meet that 63%. There are other factors such as homeowners associations that need to be paid or Real Estate taxes
Good little explanation... I wish the logic was that simple and with MI on certain loans it can still be a little more of a mess. But, definitely a clear explanation of your senarios.
I think this is endemic of what is going on in society at large. We have become a nation governed by laws and lawsuits and as a result, common sense has been thrown out the window. How many times have we encountered the "it's our policy", "our guidelines don't allow", "my hands are tied" responses from various vendors, merchants and retailers we interact with on a daily basis. My favorite (in the most frustrating way possible) is the "I know it doesn't make any sense but that's the rule." Well if everyone knows it doesn't make sense, then why in the world can't common sense prevail and change it to make sense?!?!?!
If you want to point to one of the contributing factors to the collapse of the American economic engine, you can certainly list the loss of common sense as one of the top 5 reasons.
Hi Daniel!
They are stupid,both lenders and servicers. Bureaucracy is a beutiful thing. So much waste, such little concern for doing the right thing. They should go on strike.
Kieran
Great post. I also know short sales that never happened because the bank asked for such riduclous paperwork that my clients said, "screw it" and let it foreclose. Sad.
I think your blog just goes to show why the industry is in the condition it's in and why the more things change the more they stay the same. There are lots of Stupid people with a lot of education in the upper levels of the lending organizations. Thinking has been removed from the process. These people can only choose the black pill or the white pill they can't choose a shade of gray that might just make a whole lot more sense.
While I see your point and agree that it's good to understand WHY the servicer makes the stupid decision, stupid is stupid, contractually obligated or not!
I'm working on a short sale right now. Loan balance: About 65K. BPO value: About 42K. Offer amount: 30K. Lender counter: 34K. I then submit 5 foreclosure sales within the last 6 months of similar homes, not just in the same neighborhood, not just within a 1/4 mile radius of the subject property, no, on the exact same street within two blocks either side of the subject property all sold for between 20-25K.
So based on this evidence did the lender relent and accept the 30K? Of course not. The lender disapproved the sale because they claim they never received the HUD-1 in a timely manner that was submitted to them at least 3 times since the offer was first placed. And this is on the Equator system. Every time I look at it, the HUD is sitting right there for everyone to see, yet apparently the negotiator can't view it. This has all taken about 5 months so far. 3 months yet to go before the end of redemption.
I'll be submitting a new offer at 20K next week. Based on past experience, that should do it.
I'm going with stupid . . .
Carl S
Beautiful post. I hear a lot of agents complain all the time, but they don't know what is going on behined the scenes. I hope this helps some of them.
Dan,
Sorry I'm late to the party but, I just have to say that I do hope that folks here realize just how wonderful your service is--you have the in-depth knowledge and the tenacity to get these done for agents and I could not be happier with your service.
Also, I just wanted to mention--I heart Aaron! LOL So glad he inspired you to get into the SM realm--you guys needed to get the word out about your amazing service. Thanks again for all you do here on AR and for your agents--you're the BEST!
I presented an offer on an REO. The list price was $200K. In addition to being "trashed", the place had structural damage. Buyer offered $100K CASH, the local portfolio lender replied through their agent verbally, "No Way". Several months later, they took $70K.
Next up, an REO house that showed in MLS as year 1985, listed for $250K. Research and discussions with neighbors showed that this was a 1920's house that had been moved onto the site and been renovated. Aside from the potential lawsuit for misrepresentation, the place was also a wreck. Same Buyer offered $100K. "Nope", said the Bank. Last I saw, the house was still for sale.
Per your blog title, Daniel, "Are Lenders Stupid?"
You tell me...
Thanks again for all the comments. Per your comments, the system is definitely stupid, but understanding it a bit more is a good thing :)
@Debe: Thanks for the kind words! We work really hard for agents and love it when it pays off with a happy customer. I hope we are doing business together for years to come! And Agent Aaron rocks (except when his fantasy football team beats mine).
Great blog Dan. I hate to work foreclosures and short sales. Fortunately, we dont have a lot in our area. But we are dealing with one right now. Be glad when it is finished.
to get paid not to accept an offer- instead going to foreclosure- sounds like something our government would participate in!
Thanks for a great explanation of the craziness that happens with short sales. I didn't know these things were going on behind the scenes.
Cheers,
Robin