One of the seminars I
attended today at NAR was entitled 'Managing the Risks
and Opportunities of the New Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC)."
Let me say at the
outset, I sat through the whole friggin thing and didn't note any
opportunities - unless you count aggravation as an opportunity.
No shortage of risks, however.
NAR did a great job
staging this - they had a panel in place that included spokesholes from
FHFA, FHA, Fannie Mae, Freddie
Mac and an AMC. Oh, and they had two Realtors sitting in
for balance. In my humble opinion, if I had a load of the bullshit they
were peddling today, I would have the healthiest, greenest lawn in
Southern California.
Alfred Pollard, General
Counsel for the Federal Housing Finance Agency; Jacqueline Doty,
Directory of Collateral Policy for Freddie Mac; and Mark Johnson,
COO for LSI (and Appraisal Management Co), started the
process with brief statements on why the program was started (to combat
fraud) and how well it's working. As Mr. Pollard stated - 'we
have experience a systemic event for the financial markets, primary and
secondary lenders, Realtors, institutional lenders and appraisers - all
of those industries are on the table as we determine what comes
next.'
It was interesting to
note that the one entity that he left out, the one he happens to work
for, wasn't included as being on the table - THE GOVERNMENT.
The one institution central to the whole fiasco is
the only one not up for evaluation and found wanting. In fact, these
sanctimonious bastards are now sitting in judgement of the rest of us
and determining how they can keep us from running amok again. Ain't
that special.
Our Realtor panelists,
Steve White, owner of two large Keller-Williams offices in LA; and
Penny Triplet, a Realtor and appraiser from Ohio, stated the litany of
complaints that you are all familiar with. Delays, incompetence, bad
appraisers, out of area appraisers, higher costs to customers, lost
transactions, lack of portability - you name it, they brought it
up.
The government people
claimed to be listening but they were just dancing. Time and again they
quoted passages from the 6 page HVCC document - well this is how it's
supposed to work; well, this is what it says; well that's another of
those myths; well this is how you're supposed to work through that.
Basically they acknowledged that 'there might be a few bad actors in
the group but this HVCC has solved a lot of problems and is a wonderful
thing.'
Oh, and if you thought
it was scheduled to expire in June of 2010 - think again, It's in place until next November and
there ain't nothing you or (NAR President) Charles MacMillan or anybody
else can do about it. Your opportunity is to learn how to work with it
because it's here to stay. Even after the current HVCC
expires, some form of the bureaucracy that has been set up to
administer it will continue because, like any government program, once
born it never dies.
As if the moderator knew
the Q & A might get testy, she decided that rather than
take questions from the floor, she would just take questions
submitted in writing. That lasted about 15 minutes until she could no
longer ignore the line of Realtors standing quietly at the microphones
waiting to ask questions.
Still no straight
answers were forthcoming. Realtors were advised to report bad appraisers -
that is if you can figure out who they work for or if the AMC or the
lender cares enough to return your call (after 18 months, the office
for reporting bad appraisers still hasn't quite been set up but it's
coming soon). Realtors are
allowed to talk to appraisers and even give them comps, of
course provided the appraiser even bothers to call you or come out to
your city or doesn't report you for applying undue influence by giving
them accurate comps. If you get a bad appraiser you can request a do-over,
of course it will be done by the same guy whom is now pissed off and
never mind that the delay might cost you the deal. If it's so bad your
buyer switches to another lender of course the
appraisal should be portable (like you'd want to port that
crap) unless the new lender doesn't want to accept it or it's from an
appraiser that's not accredited by their AMC, in which case your client
will get to buy a new one and hope it's better than the old one. You've
got an appraiser from 200 miles away? Or even from another state? Jeez,
that's not supposed to happen because the HVCC says it's not so it
can't be. That's just anecdotal information. The Freddie Mac
rep said complaints to her office are waaaay down since HVCC.
Complaints from appraisers that is. Turns out they don't take
complaints from Realtors unfortunately.
One Realtor summed it up
perfectly - 'The
government appears to think the problem in under control. Realtors
think the problem is out of control. How do we get the two
sides together?
If todays panel is any
indication, we don't. Hang on kiddies - it's gonna get worse before it
gets better. We're from the government and we're here to help you.
This is NOT encouraging news. Seems like "the gov't appears to think lots of problems are under control these days... that AREN'T! As for HVCC... there has to be a better solution. It is definitely out of control.