The depths of underwater home values combined with the rising tide of foreclosures caught most lenders unprepared. In the latest scandal, congress and the US Justice Department is calling for at least three major lenders (including JP Morgan, Bank of America and Ally Financial/GMAC), to prove they had the proper documentation to proceed with the foreclosures they processed in over 20 states. Allegations are that, faced with mountains of paperwork, lenders may have handled some of the foreclosures improperly. Title may have been transfered without proper documentation and in quantities too large to have been individually verified. The implications of these investigations are uncertain, but we anticipate there will be a slowing in the number of foreclosures finalized. It is unlikely that individuals who had been foreclosed upon would get their properties back, because title insurance would be used to protect the new owner who purchased the foreclosure in good faith. At best, the slowdown in processing foreclosures may help some sellers sell their homes via short sale, while allowing others to renegotiate their loans. Analysts note the number of foreclosures this year was expected to be about 20% higher than last year. To read more:
i too blogged about this. This is going to beb a huge mess not just for banks, but for buyers of bank owned properties that closed. If the foreclosure filling was not processed correctly than what happens? Ouch I guess we will find out. They would have to re-foreclose and foreclose again and than close? Not sure Crazy title mess.
David - seems to me like the risk falls on the title companies if they processed without verification. My concern was out in Santa Cruz County at least, it has been feeling like things were stabilizing. I've been able to run stats on the number of bank owned properties here and it looked like the inventory wasn't bad compared to demand. We've been lucky enough to have multiple offers on REOs so they sell quickly. I hope this doesn't clog up the inventory flow...
Comments(2)