Up selling or code compliance? How is the typical homeowner to know?
Yesterday, my wonderful landscape crew noticed a leak coming from inside the house - it was the water heater. He opened the door and the water was spewing everywhere. Oh GREAT - another expense right before Christmas!!!!!
So, I checked with a couple of other agents, the BBB and a couple of friends - one company kept coming up as the "best in town." I got the number, called, scheduled an appointment - great - all set for today!!!
Here's where I always get crazy - is it up selling or truly bringing something up to code? After inspecting the area, the plumber told me I needed a $150 part to bring the water heater hook-up up to code. I asked him how long this was a code and he replied since 1998, but "they're" really starting to look for this violation now. Hmmmmmmmmm, my house was built in late 2001/early 2002 and we bought it in 2005 with a full property inspection. This "code" part was never brought up during our home inspection and the original builder is well respected in this area. Plus, the City of Scottsdale has the reputation of having some of the toughest inspectors in all of Maricopa County.
So, where would the "normal" homeowner check to find out if this $150 part to bring the water heater hook-ups up to code is required? For me, I checked on line first - nothing there. Then, I called two of my FAVORITE building inspectors here in Scottsdale. They both confirmed that this "required" part is NOT required, just a recommendation and that for $35, the part could be installed, not $150. I can't blame the plumber for trying to up sell, but I would have had much more respect if he had said it is "recommended" we add this part for better safety or efficiency or whatever the reason this "required" part serves.
The dilemma - where would a "normal" homeowner find out this information without the contacts that we, in real estate are lucky enough to have?
And, why do these "professionals" have to up sell? I'm assuming they're on some type of commission, but it's SO TACKY!!!
Comments(41)