Start your Prairie District Neighborhood home search here.
Prairie District
Housing Type: Condo
There hasn't been much activity since last month. The condo that was listed for over $1m has been temporarily taken off the market. We may see it return soon. Two condos went under contract and more came to the market. Average listing times for all price ranges are around 4 months. If this pace continues this neighborhood could be pushing a balanced market in the near future. The median sales price for Prairie District condos was $262,750.
Price Range: $400,000-$800,000
Prairie District
Housing Type: Townhome
While many homes are taking over 100 days to sell in this market it is not always the case. The home that went under contract in the $700-800k range was only on the market for 22 days. All of the homes that are listed above $900k are new construction, so if you have a resale home in that range it will be important to bring your home up to date and make it turn-key for the next owner. The median sales price for Prairie District townhomes was $625,000.
Price Range: $400,000-800,000
Price Range: $800,000+
Prairie District
Housing Type: Single Family
The home that was under contract last month sold for $1,670,000.
Price Range: $800,000+
Start your Prairie District Neighborhood home search here.
*In this blog series we focus on one of twenty neighborhoods in Chicago, each day, and provide charts to give you a brief update on the activity that neighborhood has seen over the past month in a variety of price ranges for Single Family Homes, Townhouses, and Condos, as available.
When looking at these charts please keep in mind that not every housing type is available in every neighborhood (the Loop only has condos) and some homes compete within even smaller subsections than these, meaning we can dig even further in this data. Please let me know if you would like a personal assessment of your target market.
For information about real estate in Chicago or resources in your area please contact us and sign up for free market report.
Comments(1)