Special offer

Meal Periods: Employers Must Only "Make Meal Periods Available," Not Ensure They Are Taken

By
Property Manager with HomePointe Property Management, CRMC 00691121

Employers finally have a victory in the employee-dominated battlefield of meal and rest period litigation.  On July 22, 2008, a California Appellate Court held in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court that "while employers cannot impede, discourage or dissuade employees from taking meal periods, they need only provide them and not ensure they are taken." 

This is a victory for employers and employees.  There are times when an employee does not want to take a break.  In the restaurant business a waiter could lose tip money when serving a big party.  Some commissioned sales people might lose income as well if break times were manditory.

Manditory break times also put a burdon on the employer to enforce breaks throughout the day.  Aren't we all adults? 

Hopefully this ruling will stand but I have heard it will be apealed.  The attorneys make too much money suing businesses on behalf of their clients.

Posted by

Robert A. Machado, CPM, MPM

HomePointe Property Management

Sacramento, Yolo, El Dorado, and Placer Counties

We manage residential and commercial property.

916-429-1205 x 105

rmachado@HomePointe.com

Elizabeth Weintraub Sacramento Broker
Elizabeth Anne Weintraub, Broker - Sacramento, CA
Put 40 years of experience to work for you

An appeal? Well, I suppose the reasoning could be that nboody wants to get sued because an employee dropped over dead from starvation on the job.

elizabeth weintraub sacramento real estate agent land park

Jul 25, 2008 04:10 AM