Special offer

Yes, Size Matters: Inaccurate Square Footage Invites Trouble

By
Real Estate Agent with Keller Williams Luxury Homes 0546263

Yes, Size Matters: Inaccurate Square Footage Invites Trouble
Be careful about what numbers you use in your real estate marketing and MLS data. Measurement errors, even small ones, can mean thousands of dollars and are landing real estate professionals in court. By D. Hampton "Hamp" Thomas September 2008

Square footage is one of the most basic tools of real estate. Salespeople often use it as they add listings to the MLS or write advertising copy. 

 

Yet, few real estate practitioners are likely to have ever questioned a property's square footage as they copied it from the tax records, the developer's floor plan, or the listing in the MLS.

 

Do you think size-square footage-really matters? After all, if buyers love a property, do they really care if it's 2,700 square feet or 2,560 square feet? When the housing market is strong, people generally don't care as much about precision, but in a soft market, people become more demanding. 

 

Size affects everything from whether the couch will fit in the living room to whether the HVAC's capacity is large enough to cool the space. Also, consumers are conscious of square footage and its impact on value.

 

Measurement errors, even small ones, can mean thousands of dollars, so it's not surprising that square-footage disputes are making news-and landing some real estate professionals in court. For example, in Brown v. Roth (N.C. Ct. App. 1999), the court held that a broker who provided inaccurate data might be liable for a breach of fiduciary duty or negligence unless he "exercised reasonable care in obtaining the square footage information and communicating it to the buyer."

 

Whose Numbers Can You Trust?

 

Part of the challenge in supplying accurate square footage to clients is finding a reliable source of data. Many practitioners rely on the square footage contained in the tax assessor's records. Those records are a convenient source, but public records were never intended to be used by the real estate industry as a source of square footage. These estimates were created by and for a mass appraisal system. 

 

After comparing appraisals, MLS listings, and public records for more than four years, I found both the percentage and the size of some errors alarming.

 

One way to avoid liability is to simply avoid the question of square footage, a strategy the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® recommends. Almost all MLSs contain a general disclaimer indicating that although information is believed accurate, it's not guaranteed. 

 

The courts have generally held that these disclaimers protect real estate practitioners from liability for inaccurate square footage numbers-but do they serve the consumer? I don't think so.

 

Another way to reduce liability is to give buyers a disclosure form that explains the source of the square footage information. Colorado has adopted such a standardized form for all residential property. Although this form doesn't settle on one true measurement standard, it's a big step in the right direction.

 

In Search of a Standard

 

So how do we get more accurate square footage data? One national standard sounds wonderful, but creating a single, widely accepted standard is an extremely complex challenge, no one system can account for every possible scenario. 

 

The only formal national measurement standard currently available is the American National Standards Institute (ANSI  Z765-2003) method. It has been in circulation for more than a decade but is still not widely used.

 

To claim adherence to this standard, however, you must follow it completely, and not enough practitioners do to consider it a universal standard.

 

A standard that I believe is closer to the measurement practices used in the field today is the American Measurement Standard. The AMS is not new; in fact, it was first used in the early 1900s. Until recently, however, it was never formalized in writing. Many real estate practitioners and builders already use AMS, so it makes sense to me to that it become the universal standard.

 

Square footage-along with location-is one of the foundations of real estate valuation. A national standard, whatever its basis, will serve us and our customers well.

 

Disclosure form

 

View Colorado's new form at www.dora.state.co.us/Real-Estate/contracts/writable/SF94-05-04.pdf.

 

 

Opinions expressed in "Commentary" do not necessarily reflect the position of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® or REALTOR® Magazine.

You can contact the staff of REALTOR® magazine by e-mail at narpubs@realtors.org.

Posted by

Debbie Gill, Realtor

GRI, ABR, C.D.P.E., SRES, NHS

 (972)877-6147

Keller Williams DFW Preferred

546 E. Sandy Lake Rd., Coppell, Tx 75019

www.DebbieSellsDFW.com 

debbiegill@kw.com

 
Dinah Lee Griffey
Windermere Peninsula Properties - Allyn, WA
Managing Broker Windermere Peninsula Properties

Great point. Do we count the space in closets, or other storage spaces you can not stand up in. What if the numbers are differnt everywhere you look, such as tax records, appraisals, blue prints. You have a good argument that some one should adopt a standard-Dinah Lee

Dec 18, 2008 12:24 PM
TIM MONCRIEF
Tim Monciref - Austin, TX
Over 2,000 homes sold…..

I have worked out a deal with a board certified appraiser who is measuring my houses at $100 per house to cover my and my seller's tail.  As this is the number one law suit against sellers, it is well worth the expense to them.

Dec 18, 2008 12:38 PM
Ron Tiller
Star Referral - Grand rapids MI - Grand Rapids, MI

In the Grand Rapids Michigan Real Estae market we have a sort of hybrid system in our MLS. We provide ANSI square footage and, in a seperate field we provide TFLA ( Total Finished Living Area.) This allows us to include below grade rooms and areas that sare finished. There are disclaimers about accuracy on our MLS print outs but in court they may or may not help.

Dec 18, 2008 01:01 PM
Larry Bergstrom
Crescent Realty, Inc. Spanaway, WA. - Spanaway, WA
CNE, CRS, GRI

Debbie;

I understand your concern. In the past 30 years the biggest problem I've seen with regards to square footage was a court case in which the listing agent supplied the information and couldn't justify how they arrived at their number.  The buyer was sure that they had been ripped off.

In this particular case, both the defense and the plaintiffs attorneys hired an appraiser to measure the property to submit as evidence at trial.

Guess what?  The appraisers didn't agree on square footage either! 

There was approximately a 10% difference between the 2 appraisals.  (The judge ruled that 10% was close enough)

I like forms that put the onus on the buyer to verify the square footage etc.  All be it, agents who measure the property themselves and publish that information, should be held to some sort of standard.

Dec 18, 2008 01:29 PM
Chad & Sara Huebener
Edina Realty - Savage, MN

I love the points you makre here.  We just had an agent in our market list the largest floor plan in a neighborhood at X price (overpriced).  They then listed the SMALLEST house in the development, grossly overstated the square footage, sold it, then used the sale price to get a $50,000 price reduction from their "big house" seller because the square footage was comparable....when it's NOT. 

This dishonesty in our market is frustrating, when those that are less than truthful reap the rewards of sales and price reductions based on false data.

 

 

Mar 23, 2009 07:44 AM