Special offer

The New Evil Millionaires & Billionaires Targeted By Dems - Race Horse Owners, But Guess What, Most Aren't Millionaires

By
Real Estate Agent with Retired

The latest group of the evil rich, according to the democrats, apparantly are thoroughbred race horse owners. Democratic Senator Markely from Oregon brought this up and personally attacked Sen. McConnell for getting this through in a 2008 farm bill. Of course, he fails to mention that the bill was passed by a majority of democrats in both the house and the senate. Darn convenient to forget that.

But that is not the point, the point is, apparantly race horse owners are another group that is the evil rich. But guess what, I have known a lot of race horse owners, and none of them have been millionaires. Yes, the owners of Kentucky Derby entrants are usually millionaires (except for the horse that won a few years ago that was owned by a syndicate of average Joe's). I would estimate that the great majority of race horses are owned by that 95% of people who aren't supposed to be getting tax increases, usually in syndicates or partnerships. But apparantly, just as corporate aircraft owners are, race horse owners are greedy rich.

And guess what, repealing this democratic party passed piece of legislation will save a whopping $126 million, over 10 years. That's even less than the estimated $3 billion that eliminating the ability for corporations to depreciate jet aircraft. The combination of the two, assuming things remain static, will account for less than 1/10 of 1% of the current deficit, much less future, but are being used to demonize certain people and engender greater class warfare.

The president, and the democratic senate, are demagogueing extrememly trivial issues (when it comes to the economy) to drive a bigger wedge into the divide between the American people than there already is. Rather than joining in productive discussion, they are getting on their soap boxes, the bully pulpit in the case of Obama, spending time on minutia, all for political gain.

OK, the republicans have been guilty of this, but, the President has repeatedly stated that he was above this and would not stoop to those divisive tactics. He said so just the other day. Of course, within seconds after stating that he immediately went into a  diatribe against the republicans and overall fear mongering.

Will this change in depreciation schedule have a huge impact on the horse racing industry. Probably not. But will some be affected negatively, that is, some other than the evil millionaires and billionaires? Probably so. There will more than likely be a few  non-millionaires that don't get into it, a few syndicates that arent' formed. There might be a few hundred horses aren't put into the program. A few trainers that make a bit less money. And maybe a few grooms and stablehands that get laid off. Not enough to even notice in the employment figures. But these lawmakers need to understand, their rhetoric, and their actions (or inactions) have consequences.

So why not just agree to make proposals rather than attacks. To engage in discussion rather than demagogueing? Your constituents deserve it. The future of America requires it.

 

Than Maynard
Coldwell Banker Heart of Oklahoma - Purcell, OK
Broker - Licensed to List & Sell - 405-990-8862

It is one thing to have assest of 1 million it is quite another to be truly rich. Class politics and class warfare is all it is.

Jul 01, 2011 03:55 AM
William J. Archambault, Jr.
The Real Estate Investment Institute - Houston, TX

"...repealing this democratic party passed piece of legislation will save a whopping $126 million, over 10 years."

Wow! Think what we could save by repealing the Democratic party!

Bill

Jul 01, 2011 04:02 AM
Ron Brown NMLS #270845
NMLS ID: 40831 - Federal Way, WA

Most who engage in the breeding of thoroughbreds eventually find themselves having much in common with those who bet on them.

Jul 01, 2011 12:21 PM
Mike Saunders
Retired - Athens, GA

Than - but most people have no clue about that

Bill - and some republicans also

Ron - ?

Jul 02, 2011 01:24 AM
Yolanda Hoversten
Self Employed - O'Fallon, IL
Referrals for O’Fallon, IL & the Metro East

There aren't enough rich people to tax to support Obama's programs. So what is left? They'll go down the line until it reaches the lowly real estate agents, sales clerks, and the french fryers. Yes, he can!

Jul 02, 2011 06:47 AM
Cheryl Campbell
Jack White Real Estate - Wasilla, AK
Wasilla Alaska Realtor

The very politicians that target "millionaires and billionaires" are millionaires or are supported and funded by billionaires themselves. 

Obama and his admin. keep using the class warfare routine, and unfortunately it does work on too many Americans.

Jul 03, 2011 07:09 AM
Mike Saunders
Retired - Athens, GA

Yolanda - remember, the Income Tax was passed on the premise that only the wealthiest 1% would be taxed.

Cheryl - because it appeals to a large group of people who do not pay any income tax, now up to 51% of those who file.

Jul 04, 2011 08:50 AM
Tim Peterson
Wisconsin Realtor Safety and Concealed Carry Classes - Madison, WI
Realtor Safety Training Classes

Hi Mike wow race horse owners--I never knew

Jul 04, 2011 04:59 PM
Mike Saunders
Retired - Athens, GA

Tim - pretty soon it will be home owners.

Jul 06, 2011 05:26 AM
Nogui Aramburo
Linda Craft & Team, REALTORS® - Raleigh, NC
Real Estate Professional in the Raleigh Area

Bill Maher puts it plain and simple so that even a caveman can understand it!

"Now here's Obama's thinking, and it's a little counter-intuitive, but try to follow it. When Clinton was President, the rich paid a little more taxes, and the government had money.  Then Bush cut all those taxes, and now we don't.  I know it's hard to grasp, it involves subtracting.  But in suggesting that in these desperate times, we slightly raise the tax on private jets, Obama was baiting the Republicans to look like extremists by defending private jets."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=G3bSCywUtf8

Jul 09, 2011 07:58 AM
Mike Saunders
Retired - Athens, GA

Nogui - and, like Bill Maher, the cave man would come to the wrong conclusion. The U.S. achieved a "balanced budget" on paper (it is important to note that it was not a real balanced budget, there was no surplus, the national debt increased, which means the U.S. government spent more than it took it, the years that there was a so called balanced budget). What happenned was that Clinton signed off on a republican budget that cut spending. Under Bush, there were record income tax revenues after the tax cuts. The problem was that spending increased at a greater rate than revenue. Kind of like an ex-wife that always spent more than both she and I earned.

Jul 09, 2011 08:53 AM