Special offer

Another Federal Bailout...the FHA Needs (our) MONEY

By
Real Estate Attorney with http://www.medicalandspaconsulting.com

Another Federal bailout...the FHA Needs (our) MONEY!!! It is a little early to know for certain, but it appears that the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) may need a $900+ million bailout.  The exact ami9unt will be clear at the end of the third quarter of this year. The reason for the bailout is that the FHA needs to “reinforce its capital reserves.” Apparently ,this information was buried in the details of the president’s proposed budget released that was recently released.  Shaun Donovan attempted to explain the FHA’s problems in the wake of public outcry over the dismissal projections for the FHA. Donovan explained that $900+ million in deficits is actually a good thing because “newer, safer business is expected this year”. However, his explanation actually may have just made taxpayers more nervous, since he said that the reason the deficit wasn’t much bigger is that “new loans that the FHA is making [this year] are profitable, if I can use that term.”

 

 The FHA was founded almost 80 years ago and it has needed a bailout.  Critics of the agency are outraged by the suggestion that nearly a billion dollars should be put aside in the federal budget for the FHA. “If the FHA were a private financial institution, likely somebody would be fired, somebody would be fined, or the institution would find itself in receivership,” ranted congressional representative Jeb Hensarling (R-TX). He added that “instead, the FHA is merrily on its way to becoming the recipient of the next great taxpayer bailout”.FHA

Fortunately for the FHA, even if no members of Congress approved of its bailout, it could withdraw bailout money from the U.S. Treasury without congressional approval. The president’s administration noted in the budget that the funds might not be needed if increases in FHA insurance premiums tide the agency over.

 

The problem with this is that the Obama administration already tacked on .1% on every FHA loan to pay for the current administration’s policies.  Any additional increase will cost taxpayers and home owner’s additional money. Further, the FHA is still lending in the equivalency of sub-prime loans so it is reasonable to conclude that  the future is bleak for the FHA.

Edward & Celia Maddox
The Celtic Connection Realty - Queen Creek, AZ
EXPERIENCE & INTEGRITY - WE TAKE THE HIGH ROAD

I wish our dear goverment would learn how to budget instead of taking our hard earned dollars or just printing more to weaken our purchase power.

Apr 17, 2013 03:57 AM
Glenn Freezman
Family Abstract, Inc. - Horsham, PA

Paddy, I love the country it's the Government I'm afraid of.  I love that you wrote "OUR MONEY".  It's amazing that people think the Government actually has money and it's not OURS!!

Apr 17, 2013 04:03 AM
Paddy Deighan MBA JD PhD
http://www.medicalandspaconsulting.com - Vail, CO
Paddy Deighan J.D. Ph.D

I agree that the perception is that the "government" money is not "our" money. Where do people think that it comes from??

Apr 17, 2013 05:13 AM
Steven Cook
No Longer Processing Mortgages. - Tacoma, WA

Paddy -- the problem with the ever increasing costs of the FHA mortgage insurance program is that it will be driving more people away from FHA loans - thereby further undercutting their ongoing income stream.  Why do they keep thinking that raising the price will bring in more money?  It is like they never had to choose between two similar products with greatly different prices.

Apr 17, 2013 06:11 AM
Paddy Deighan MBA JD PhD
http://www.medicalandspaconsulting.com - Vail, CO
Paddy Deighan J.D. Ph.D

Steve, I could not agree more....government needs to be run more like a business...that is why I would support candidates such as Donald Trump or Ross Perot

Apr 17, 2013 06:31 AM
Joe Petrowsky
Mortgage Consultant, Right Trac Financial Group, Inc. NMLS # 2709 - Manchester, CT
Your Mortgage Consultant for Life

I have done 14 applications so fare this week, two of which were FHA, normally it would have been 4 or 5. Not best for my clients.

Apr 25, 2013 08:07 AM
Paddy Deighan MBA JD PhD
http://www.medicalandspaconsulting.com - Vail, CO
Paddy Deighan J.D. Ph.D

FHA seems to be the only alternative for most buyers today..i just read a blog that the FHA allows buyers to purchase with a judgment if they have a replayment plan in place

Apr 25, 2013 08:10 AM