Should a Simple Repair Needed on a Property Kill a Deal?
In quite a few of my recent Mortgage transactions, I've seen Appraisal Reports where the Appraiser has commented that the condition of the REO property (foreclosed) they are viewing has been "Less than ideal". In each instance, the definition for "Less than ideal" has not been a true cause of concern in the Appraiser's eye.
However, I have found each time that the Underwriter has seen this statement regarding property "blemishes" on the Appraisal Report as some sort of red flag. Then the "blemish" has become an Underwriting issue. This has been true even when the Contract and the Appraisal and the Listing all read ... "property to be Sold "As Is".
In each of these cases, property repairs were then either: A. Required by Underwriting to be done ... or
B. The Appraiser was asked to submit further clarification on their "Less than ideal" comment.
The Underwriter wanted to know what the impact on value, safety, or marketability was for the "blemish" noted.
The irony found in these scenarios is that there is a very likely chance that Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or FHA Insurance will be backing the new loan(s) and none would want the collateral to be what they consider "damaged property". These situations have become a battle of wills. Who is right? Who is wrong? What needs to occur so the transaction can move forward?
Bottomline, each of the participants (Appraiser, Underwriter) have responsibilities within their jobs to fulfill, an important role to play in the transaction. At the end of the day, the Underwriters are viewing this as the End-Lenders' and/or the Originating Lender's call to make. The fact remains though, the property needs to sell. The property needs to be liveable and financeable. So, if the Loan Approval is contingent on fixing items, such as:
* Exposed Electrical Wiring & Hanging Light Fixtures
* Missing Handrails
* Darkened, Discolored Drywall/Plaster/Foundations
* Leaky Roofs
* Rotted Wood
Comments(40)