Does it really make a difference if someone dies in a home by natural causes or by illness?
A person died in one of my listed Silicon Valley homes. The woman lived there for 31 years. She died 2 weeks before her 99th Birthday. Of course the seller disclosed the fact that there was a death in the home within the past three years. That is all a seller is required to do. I get asked questions like:
- Did the person die of natural causes or an illness?
- How old was the person?
- Who was the person?
Seriously, does it matter? Last time I checked death is death? I'm sensing there may be some exceptions for people who have an issue buying a home when they know someone died there. I emphasize "know" because the disclosure requirement in California for a death in the property is within the past three years.
Is solving a buyer's curiosity by answering these questions really going to make a difference in a buyer's decision to buy the home - or are they just curious?
I happen to be a person who completely embraces death. We are all going to die - no one gets out of life alive! I understand that some people have a real issue with death and some people have a real issue buying a home when they know someone died in it. I honor that and would not attempt to sell anyone on the idea that "it's OK." I get that it is only OK if someone already believes it is OK. If they know someone died in the home - is that not enough?
What are your thoughts? What difference does it make if it was an old person, a young person, a male, a female, a baby, or a child? Is the issue really with death or who and how they died?
Kathleen Daniels is a San Jose ~ Silicon Valley Real Estate Broker Agent serving the needs of home buyers and home sellers in San Jose and Silicon Valley ~ Santa Clara County.
Copyright © 2008, All Rights Reserved by Kathleen Daniels *Death by Natural Causes*
Comments(29)