Special offer

I'm not a Lawyer but I Can Read the Law

By
Real Estate Agent with Atlanta Communities Real Estate Brokerage GREC #208281
I always like to go to the source when it comes to trying make sense out of current events.  So when FBI director Comey came out the other day and layed out the case of gross negligence in the handling of Clinton's emails but then said that he didn't recommend bringing charges due to not having the required "intent" that was necessary, I thought I would find the actual law and read it myself.  
It doesn't take an expert to read the law and understand it.  It just takes attention to the written word.  Let's take a look at the law as it is written.  The law in question is US Code Title 18, part 1, chapter 37, section 793. 
First, you have to note that there are parts a, b, c, d, e, f, and g.
The one about gross negligence is part f.
One needs to note that part a and b have qualifiers at the beginning for purpose and intent.  I highlighted it for easier viewing.
Please note that there is no need for intent in part f.  It is enough to be grossly negligent.  If intent were necessary, it would have stated that in the beginning of part f as they did in part a and b.  They didn't skip the intent portion for section f because they wanted to save words.  If the words aren't there, it's not in the law.  It is what it says, nothing more, noting less.
Comey said that all other cases of negligence have always had intent as part of the case.  Here is one example of case law where intent clearly was not needed to bring charges.

An FBI search of Nishimura's home turned up classified materials, but did not reveal evidence he intended to distribute them.

He was sentenced to two years of probation and a $7,500 fine, and was ordered to surrender his security clearance. He is barred from seeking a future security clearance.

So you tell me if a presidential candidate is being given special treatement under the law.
We either have laws that apply equally to all citizens or we need to get rid of them.  
Having laws that are randomly enforced just makes the public lose respect for the law.  When the public loses respect for the law, society falls into chaos.  Then it's no longer about the law, it's about the political connections that you have.
 
(a)
Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or
(b)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or
(c)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or
(d)
Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(e)
Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(g)
If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.
Posted by

 

 

About the Author:  Tim Maitski has been a full time Realtor since 1999. He has sold several hundreds of homes in areas around metro Atlanta.  Tim started with RE/MAX Greater Atlanta and is now with Atlanta Communities Real Estate Brokerage.

 

Along with blogging on ActiveRain, he provides one of the best real estate websites in Atlanta at www.HomeAtlanta.com .

 

His proprietary  "Maitski Line Reports" chart out the absorption rates over the past 14 years in 37 different market areas.  Know when it's a good time to buy or a good time to sell.    

 

His online Property Tax Calculator allows you to compare property taxes in many counties and cities around the Atlanta area.  He provides the Atlanta MLS Power Search Tool that allows searches of homes using over 35 specific criteria.

 

Over the years, Tim has optimized his business so that he now can offer a huge 50% commission rebate to his buyers.  The more experience one gets, the easier the job becomes.

 

Tim also has a "Five Days to Sold" System that uses an intensive marketing blitz to create a showing frenzy that creates urgency and offers.

 

Tim is always looking to LinkIn with anyone who is interested in building their social network.

 

View Tim Maitski ●Atlanta Realtor●'s profile on LinkedIn

CA COASTAL ESTATES Lauren Selinsky Perez CRS
California Coastal Estates - Aliso Viejo, CA
"Your Real Estate Broker" #oclauren

Uh? Politics and real estate? Not my mix. I can read the law though...

 

Lauren Selinsky

Jul 07, 2016 06:38 AM
Tim Maitski
Atlanta Communities Real Estate Brokerage - Atlanta, GA
Truth, Excellence and a Good Deal

Lauren,  In real estate, when there is a question, I'm always told to go back and read what the contract actually calls for.   That's why the law and real estate are related.  That is why I posted this.  If one can't go by the actual words of the law, then what's the  point?

Jul 07, 2016 07:26 AM
Kartik Subramaniam
Adhi Schools, LLC - Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Market Analysis--Educational Content, Adhi Schools

Tim Maitski I won't comment on the particular case here because I do not want to mingle representing my company and politics...but I will say that it is very important for real estate professionals to read the word of law themselves and be able to understand what it means (even if advising on the law is a job for legal professionals). There are plenty of times when a real estate pro is also a legal resource, and I can see you are willing to embrace that, bravo.  

Jul 07, 2016 08:11 AM
Tim Maitski
Atlanta Communities Real Estate Brokerage - Atlanta, GA
Truth, Excellence and a Good Deal

Cody,  You get my point.  It's incumbent on Americans to be able to read and understand the actual law if we are at risk of being prosecuted for breaking the law.

I wanted to post a link to another story I found about a Navy guy being prosecuted for taking pictures on a submarine and inadvertantly getting potential secret information on them.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/navy-sailor-pleads-guilty-pictures-nuclear-submarine-article-1.2652586

They prosecuted him even though they never alleged that he had intent.

 

"The feds have never alleged he shared or planned to share the pictures.

Yet, Department of Justice officials said in a statement Friday, “Saucier had a secret clearance and knew that the photos depicted classified material and that he was not authorized to take them. He retained these photos and failed to deliver them to any officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it.”

Jul 07, 2016 11:37 PM
Kartik Subramaniam

Tim Maitski just got back to this thread. Great comments. Important for people to understand the law and that the specific wording is more important in law than anywhere else. One wrong word can change the law from what it is intended to be. It happens all the time. It's where half of the loopholes in the law are from. Oversight+diction=loophole. So there are so many applications of the ability to read legal language. It is intimidating and we're told we need a lawyer, but really we don't need a lawyer to understand a law. Lawyers can apply it to the body of law, but they don't have to explain something like this. 

Jul 19, 2016 01:55 AM
Tim Maitski
Atlanta Communities Real Estate Brokerage - Atlanta, GA
Truth, Excellence and a Good Deal

Here's Comey's testimony where he states that he implied something into the law that isn't actually there.

REP. KEN BUCK: Congress specifically omitted the word willfully from this statute, and yet you are implying the word willfully in the statute, is that fair?

DIR. JAMES COMEY: That's fair.

Jul 07, 2016 11:54 PM
Tony and Suzanne Marriott, Associate Brokers
Serving the Greater Phoenix and Scottsdale Metropolitan Area - Scottsdale, AZ
Coldwell Banker Realty

Hi Tim Maitski!

Thanks for a great post on this topic - couldn't agree more!

We like your writing style!

We wish you great success with your blog posts and networking with other members of Active Rain!

We clicked the “Follow” button on your profile so that we will be alerted to your future blog posts and can read and comment on them, and we invite you to "follow us" - should you be interested. There is no requirement or obligation for you to do so, but we would be honored if you choose to do so!

Aug 01, 2016 06:37 AM
Brian L. Sirota, Esq.
Bristar Realty (Realtor/Attorney) - Orange, CA
For Solutions: (714) 501-7660

Hi Tim:  It's good to read laws that affect us, but we should be careful to apply the proper facts, or the exercise may be futile.

FBI Director Comey never used the words "gross negligence," which is the operative language of "part f" that you're pointing us to.    Rather, he used the language "extremely careless."    

As matter of interpretation, some argue not much difference exists in these phrases,  but your point is not about interpretation.   In fact, your point was exactly the opposite  "...to look at the law as written."

I understand how a mistake like this occurs.   The media is littered with the incorrect version. 

I hope you take this as the non-partisan comment it's meant to be.

 

Aug 08, 2016 12:32 PM
Tim Maitski

Brian,  I don't know if they actually define "gross negligence" or leave it up to a judge or jury to decide.


I will have to try to look that up.


But to  a common person, I would think "gross" and extremely" are the same.  and "negligence" and "careless" are also the same.


Comey didn't say that he didn't bring charges due to Clinton being "extremely careless" vs. "grossly negligent".  He said that he didn't bring charges because of the lack of intent. My point of this post is that the actual law doesn't require intent as Comey suggested.

Aug 08, 2016 10:48 PM