The Nature Of The Beast Called Blogging

Laura - thanks for stopping by

Nina - quite probably.

Michael - thank you. It is interesting how we tend to "bend" the medium and adjust it in some way or the other. Like Twitter or Facebook for business.

Yes, we can work on a car, and add wings, and it really may fly, but should we? there are other ways of flying...

Same here, it is simply the wrong medium for this. Can we "bend" and "twist" it. I gues we can.

Should we? I don't really see a reason.

Richie - and you are one of the most curious and open minded. I don't do it, too.

Rob - you may laugh at me, but I truly believe that your test is the best test out there. So many people look down at customers. They educate them, but often do not treat as equals.

Thank you

John - yes, absolutely. Simply the wrong medium for that. Of course, we can sequel as much as we want, but expecting that we have the same people on each segment would be very unrealistic

Graziella - you can make it easier, yes. This is what you do.

You can't make them follow you. Or follow in certain sequence, or follow all your links...

Olga - there are two sides to it. Us, our goals, and them, and their habits. If there is a conflict between them, we are unlikely to win :)

Wanda - I occasionally read their posts, and never noticed, or maybe did not pay attention to sequels.

I read posts as singles, and usually ignore the links in the post and do not follow them. I am sure I would follow the link if this would be something I am really interested in, though...

Charles - this is not surprising. Sequels often is an attempt to capitalize on the success of the first and the best

Andrea - probably you are right, but I have always found it difficult to write for Google, and I always forget about writing for Google.

I meant when you are writing for people, exactly what you said.

Thanks for straightening me on that.